Thursday, October 31, 2019

Washington Post (Jews and White Freemasons) Calls for a “Hate Speech” Law in America

Richard Stengel, a former State Department official, TIME magazine editor and Atlantic Council distinguished fellow, recently wrote a piece “Why America Needs a Hate Speech Law” for the Washington Post, wherein he argued against the First Amendment.
It is important to remember that our First Amendment doesn’t just protect the good guys; our foremost liberty also protects any bad actors who hide behind it to weaken our society.
Stengel goes on to discuss how Russia supposedly used fake identities and fake stories to influence the 2016 election, all while utilizing our pesky First Amendment.
That’s partly because the intellectual underpinning of the First Amendment was engineered for a simpler era. The amendment rests on the notion that the truth will win out in what Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas called “the marketplace of ideas.” This “marketplace” model has a long history going back to 17th-century English intellectual John Milton, but in all that time, no one ever quite explained how good ideas drive out bad ones, how truth triumphs over falsehood.
We don’t need an authoritarian government determining which ideas are good and which need to be censored for being too dangerous. I’ll tell you how good ideas win out over bad ones – good ideas are obviously true, while bad ones require laws to enforce them at the point of a gun. Take the Holocaust narrative, for example. Truth really does get revealed in the marketplace of ideas, but our rulers are not interested in the truth.
Milton, an early opponent of censorship, said truth would prevail in a “free and open encounter.” A century later, the framers believed that this marketplace was necessary for people to make informed choices in a democracy. Somehow, magically, truth would emerge. The presumption has always been that the marketplace would offer a level playing field. But in the age of social media, that landscape is neither level nor fair.
The landscape is not level nor fair, because the ADL is embedded in every major social media company, censoring anyone who is even remotely close to the truth.
On the Internet, truth is not optimized. On the Web, it’s not enough to battle falsehood with truth; the truth doesn’t always win. In the age of social media, the marketplace model doesn’t work. A 2016 Stanford study showed that 82 percent of middle schoolers couldn’t distinguish between an ad labeled “sponsored content” and an actual news story. Only a quarter of high school students could tell the difference between an actual verified news site and one from a deceptive account designed to look like a real one.
This guy is seriously trying to convince us that “actual” news sites tell the truth, when it has been known for decades, at least since the revelations of the CIA’s Operation Mockingbird, that all outlets have been completely controlled to push propaganda to the American people. You could probably get more truth from The Onion than the Washington Post, which is owned by Jeff Bezos, who also has a lucrative contract with the CIA to work on their cloud computing.
Domestic terrorists such as Dylann Roof and Omar Mateen and the El Paso shooter were consumers of hate speech. […]
See how dangerous “hate speech” is? It will create PsyOp terrorists who shoot up black churches and commit homocausts! I love how the justifications that are given for the removal of our rights are all obviously hoax events, since there are no real life instances they can easily point to. This is why our enemies stage terror in the first place.
Why shouldn’t the states experiment with their own version of hate speech statutes to penalize speech that deliberately insults people based on religion, race, ethnicity and sexual orientation?
States actually have implemented such draconian legislation already, outlawing criticism of Israel and jewish power, and we recently saw two UConn students arrested for saying the word “nigger” on video. Stengel wants more of this “experimentation” with tyrannical speech police, so as to shut up his ideological opponents.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Featured Post

The Value of Selflessnes