Thursday, February 28, 2019

National Socialists Filmed Marching with Torches at Hitler’s Nuremberg Rally Arena

Members of a National Socialist group face criminal charges in the zionist occupied Germany after staging a torch-wielding march through parts of Nuremberg used by Adolf Hitler to stage rallies in the 1930s.
Saturday's procession, which included those affiliated to the patriotic National Democratic Party (NPD) and Wodan's Erben Germania, began at a hostel for refugees in the Bavarian city.
Police asked the gathering to disband but the group, dressed in black, later re-assembled and marched towards Nuremberg's former NSDAP rally grounds holding lit torches.
Members of the group posed on the Zeppelinfeld tribune, an arena which was once adorned by a large swastika that provided seating for 200,000 National Socialist faithful.
Police in Bavaria later apologised for missing chances to stop the march, saying they had "used historically sensitive sites for propaganda purposes".
Anti-fascist groups expressed outrage that the procession was able to go ahead unhindered.
Max Gnugesser-Mair, of the Nuremberg Stop the Nazi Alliance, said he was “stunned that there can once again be Nazi torchlight marches on the historic site in the former city of the Nuremberg Rallies … such events must be prevented”.
Sebastian Hansen, of Bavaria's Green Youth, has filed a criminal complaint against the rally for “glorifying the Nazis”.
Robert Pollack of Nuremberg’s public order office said he was also considering action against those involved.
Bavaria's Office for the Protection of the Constitution has designated Wodan's Erben Germania as a "right-wing extremist group" while the NPD is an "ultranationalist group" founded as successor to the German Reich Party.
The government has struggled with how to preserve its NS-era monuments without allowing them to become meeting points for the patriots.
Chief among them is the Zeppelinfeld arena, a huge complex designed by Albert Speer, Hitler’s favourite architect.
The site, one of Germany’s largest listed building complexes, is protected by law but has fallen into disrepair in recent years.

New economic stats blow up Trump’s promises of long-term economic growth as tax cuts flop: CNBC anchor

CNBC editor at large John Harwood told MSNBC on Thursday that the new Congressional Budget Office report blows up Trump’s promises of up to 6% economic growth, and despite his tax cuts, worker take home pay hasn’t increased.
“The president and his economics team promised tax cuts and deregulation would lift America’s gross domestic product, or GDP as most people call it, above 3%, and keep it there,” said host Stephanie Ruhle as she introduced her guest. “The new numbers indicate that the economy slowed less than expected, that is good, but we are already seeing signs of slowing in the first quarter of 2019 especially in manufacturing.”
“This has been a long standing Republican theme,” Harwood said, reminding viewers that the GOP promised better economic growth than under Obama.
“What we’ve seen today from these numbers is that Trump has gotten to 2.9%. That is not better than Obama,” Harwood said. “In fact we saw growth decline from 4.2% in the second quarter, to 3.4% in the third quarter, 2.6 in the fourth, expected to be in the 1s in the first quarter of 2019.”
“In the long run, the CBO and Federal Reserve both say that long term growth will be below 2%,” he continued. “That is not what the trump team promised that they were going to deliver with tax cuts and deregulation.”
Ruhle asked Harwood to “de-wonk” the numbers and explain what they mean for ordinary people.
“Long term economic growth was supposed to be the thing that lifted the living standard of average Americans,” he replied. “We’ve seen long term stagnation, increasing income inequality but people in the middle and working class have not been moving ahead. People at the top have been moving ahead.” He added that “the key” to greater paychecks for middle class families was “making labor more valuable for businesses to pay.”
“There is no sign that that’s going to happen. Wages continue to grow ahead of inflation, but not by that much,” Harwood said. “So we haven’t really seen the fundamental shift in worker take home pay from the Obama Administration despite tax cuts.”

Trump biographer says people will be ‘shocked’ by the president’s finances: ‘He has the lifestyle of a billionaire’ — but no wealth

During his February 27 testimony before the House Oversight Committee, President Donald Trump’s former personal attorney, Michael Cohen, observed, “It was my experience that Mr. Trump inflated his total assets when it served his purposes.” And when journalist/author David Cay Johnston appeared on CNN the morning after Cohen’s testimony, he explained why the attorney’s statement on Trump’s finances was quite accurate—and why Trump isn’t as wealthy as he would have people believe.
The 70-year-old Johnston (author of the 2018 book “It’s Even Worse Than You Think: What the Trump Administration Is Doing to America” and 2016’s “The Making of Donald Trump”) has been writing about Trump’s finances for decades, and he told CNN’s Alisyn Camerota that exaggerating his net worth is nothing new for The Donald.
Johnston recalled, “I revealed in 1990 that (Trump) wasn’t a billionaire, and Donald called me a liar until he had to put in the record documents showing he had a negative net worth of almost $300 million.”
Camerota asked Johnston what Americans can expect when Trump’s tax returns are made public—and the author responded that “one of the things that we’re going to see is that his adjusted gross income” in “some recent years” was “less than $500,000. We know that because he got something in New York called the star property tax credit on his principal home, which is in Trump Tower. You only get that if your adjusted gross income is less $500,000.”
Johnston went on to say that “people are going to be very shocked about his finances” and will see that Trump “has the lifestyle of a billionaire, but he doesn’t have any kind of wealth.”
Camerota went on to play for Johnston a clip of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez questioning Cohen during Wednesday’s House Oversight Committee hearing. Ocasio-Cortez asked Cohen if Trump ever provided “inflated assets to an insurance company,” and Trump’s former employee replied, “Yes.”
Johnston told Camerota that he thought Ocasio-Cortez “did an excellent job of examining the witness,” adding that while “there was a lot of preening by both parties that had nothing to do with the issues,” the New York City congresswoman “went right to the point” and “did questions the way a good lawyer or investigative reporter would do.”

‘Trump should be worried’ that GOP allies botched the Michael Cohen hearing: Former federal prosecutor

Former federal prosecutor Ken White thinks President Donald Trump should be very concerned about his House Republican allies and their completely ineffectual attempts to hurt the credibility of former “fixer” Michael Cohen.
Writing in The Atlantic, White argues that both Republicans and Democrats missed major opportunities during Wednesday’s explosive Cohen testimony, but he says the ineptitude of GOP lawmakers was on a different level.
“House Republicans needed a trial lawyer—or even a moderately bright junior-high mock-trial participant—to tell them how to do anything,” he said. “They provided Cohen with one slow pitch up the middle after another, letting him repeat the cooperating witness’s go-to explanation like a mantra: I did these bad things so often and so long because that’s what it took to work for your guy. I have seldom seen a cross-examination go worse.”
These blunders, he writes, should gravely worry the Trump White House that is depending on the House GOP to protect the president from impeachment.
“Team Trump should be worried,” he writes. “Republicans did not successfully destroy Cohen’s credibility… Today Republicans had the opportunity to learn… that theatrical committee hearing tactics are ineffective against a witness trained to withstand cross-examination. Will the president of the United States ever learn that a federal criminal investigation is not a reality show?”

Trump chief of staff kept paper trail after president ordered him to grant Kushner top-secret clearance: report

President Donald Trump ordered his chief of staff to grant his son-in-law Jared Kushner top-secret security clearance last year in spite of intelligence officials’ warnings.
The New York Times reported that the decision in May 2018 concerned then-Chief of Staff John Kelly so much, he “wrote a contemporaneous internal memo about how he had been ‘ordered’ to give Mr. Kushner the top-secret clearance.”
The report noted that then-White House counsel Don McGahn also wrote a memo about security concerns regarding Kushner — including those raised by the CIA. The memo also included a recommendation McGahn received that the president’s son-in-law not be granted the clearance.
Trump claimed in a January interview with the Times that he had no role in Kushner’s clearance.

Deborah Tavares: Floods Are Planned – Climate Control and Weather Weapon Disasters

Deborah Tavares told us about the fires that were going to take out large parts of California before they did, now she is warning about imminent flooding. Trust her or not, you should probably listen.

UNHRC: Israel Intentionally Shot Children, Medics in Gaza Protests

Renegade Editor’s Note: Of course the (((UN))) as a whole will never move against Israel in a serious way.
(MEMO) Israel deliberately targeted children and journalists during peaceful protests in Gaza, putting them in breach of international law, the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) said in a report today.
The UNHRC found that footage from the scene, eye witness accounts and medical records have shown  that Israeli soldiers opened fire on medical staff and journalists covering the “Great March of Return”.
Two journalists and two medical workers were killed by live ammunition, and 39 of each were injured between 30 March and 31 December 2018, despite their protected status under international law.
They also found that women and disabled people were targeted by Israeli soldiers.
It continued, that despite having knowledge early on that “shooting by Israeli security forces of Palestinian demonstrators with high-velocity weaponry at close range resulted in killings and long-term, life-changing injuries, including paralysis and amputations … Israeli forces continued this practice.” This, the report continues, “indicates a disproportionate use of force”.
It added that it had found “reasonable grounds to believe that … the use of live ammunition by Israeli security forces against demonstrators was unlawful.”
In just one day on 14 May, the Israeli army shot and killed seven children, the youngest being only 13 years of age.
Of the 189 found to have been killed during these protests, the UNHRC concluded that only 29 were affiliated to armed groups.
The commission also found Israel has consistently failed to investigate and prosecute commanders and soldiers who are alleged to have committed crimes against Palestinians and cast doubt over Israel’s willingness to scrutinise the actions of the military and civilian leadership who drafted and approved these rules of engagement.
In a series of recommendations to the Israeli government, the UNHRC demanded an end to the blockade of the Gaza Strip immediately, that demonstrators be given swift access to medical care, and that Israel cease using lethal force against civilians, journalists, medical staff, children and disabled people.
Amongst other things, they recommended an immediate investigation into alleged war crimes committed, and to hold those responsible to account.
They called on the UN Commissioner for Human Rights to handle and distribute the evidence presented and distributed to legal bodies including the International Criminal Court for investigation into the alleged perpetrators.
Those found guilty of crimes should  be sanctioned, have their assets frozen and be extradited for trial, the report added.
The Israeli government dismissed the report as a “theatre of the absurd”.
With acting Foreign Minister Israel Katz branding the report “hostile and mendacious, and slanted against the State of Israel”, citing Tel Aviv’s “right to self-defence”.

This article originally appeared on Middle East Monitor.

Government Research Confirms Measles Outbreaks Are Transmitted By The Vaccinated

By Sayer Ji
One of the fundamental errors in thinking about measles vaccine effectiveness is that receipt of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine equates to bona fide immunity against measles virus. Indeed, it is commonly claimed by health organizations like the CDC that receiving two doses of the MMR vaccine is “97 percent effective in preventing measles,” despite a voluminous body of contradictory evidence from epidemiology and clinical experience.
This erroneous thinking has led the public, media and government alike to attribute the origin of measles outbreaks, such as the one reported at Disney in 2015 (and which lead to the passing of SB277 that year, stripping vaccine exemptions for all but medical reasons in California), to the non-vaccinated, even though 18% of the measles cases occurred in those who had been vaccinated against it — hardly the vaccine’s two-dose claimed “97% effectiveness.” The vaccine’s obvious fallibility is also indicated by the fact that that the CDC now requires two doses.
But the problems surrounding the failing MMR vaccine go much deeper. First, they carry profound health risks (over 25 of which we have indexed here: MMR vaccine dangers), including increased autism risk, which a senior CDC scientist confessed his agency covered up, which do not justify the risk, given that measles is not only not deadly but confers significant health benefits that have been validated in the biomedical literatureSecond, not only does the MMR vaccine fail to consistently confer immunitybut those who have been “immunized” with two doses of MMR vaccine can still transmit the infection to others — a phenomena no one is reporting on in the rush to blame the non- or minimally-vaccinated for the outbreak.
MMR Vaccinated Can Still Spread Measles
Three years ago, a groundbreaking study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases, whose authorship included scientists working for the Bureau of Immunization, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, and the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, looked at evidence from the 2011 New York measles outbreak that individuals with prior evidence of measles vaccination and vaccine immunity were both capable of being infected with measles and infecting others with it (secondary transmission).
This finding even aroused the attention of mainstream news reporting, such as this article from April 2014 titled “Measles Outbreak Traced to Fully Vaccinated Patient for First Time.”
Titled, “Outbreak of Measles Among Persons With Prior Evidence of Immunity, New York City, 2011,” the groundbreaking study acknowledged that, “Measles may occur in vaccinated individuals, but secondary transmission from such individuals has not been documented.”
In order to find out if measles vaccine compliant individuals are capable of being infected and transmitting the infection to others, they evaluated suspected cases and contacts exposed during a 2011 measles outbreak in NYC. They focused on one patient who had received two doses of measles-containing vaccine and found that,
Of 88 contacts, four secondary cases were confirmed that had either two doses of measles-containing vaccine or a past positive measles IgG antibody. All cases had laboratory confirmation of measles infection, clinical symptoms consistent with measles, and high avidity IgG antibody characteristic of a secondary immune response.”
Their remarkable conclusion:
This is the first report of measles transmission from a twice vaccinated individual. The clinical presentation and laboratory data of the index were typical of measles in a naïve individual. Secondary cases had robust anamnestic antibody responses. No tertiary cases occurred despite numerous contacts. This outbreak underscores the need for thorough epidemiologic and laboratory investigation of suspected measles cases regardless of vaccination status.”
Did you follow that? A twice-vaccinated individual, from a NYC measles outbreak, was found to have transmitted measles to four of her contacts, two of which themselves had received two doses of MMR vaccine and had prior presumably protective measles IgG antibody results.
This phenomenon — the MMR vaccine compliant infecting other MMR vaccine compliant cases – has been ignored by health agencies and the media. This data corroborates the possibility that, during the Disney measles outbreak the previously vaccinated (any of the 18% known to have become infected) may have become infected or already were shedding measles from a vaccine and transmitted measles to both the vaccinated and the non-vaccinated.
Moreover, these CDC and NYC Bureau of Immunization scientists identified a ‘need’ for there to be “thorough epidemiologic and laboratory investigation of suspected measles cases regardless of vaccination status,” i.e. investigators must rule out vaccine failure and infection by fully infected individuals as contributing to measles outbreaks.
Instead, what’s happening now is that the moment a measles outbreak occurs, a reflexive ‘blame the victim’ attitude is assumed, and the media and/or health agencies report on the outbreak as if it has been proven the afflicted are under or non-vaccinated – often without sufficient evidence to support these claims.  Clearly stakeholders in the vaccine/non-vaccine debate need to look at the situation through the lens of the evidence itself and not science by proclamation or pleas to authority.
Amazingly, the truth has been suppressed for decades. Twenty years ago, the MMR vaccine was found to infect virtually all of its recipients with measles. Scientists working at the CDC’s National Center for Infectious Diseases, funded by the WHO and the National Vaccine Program, discovered something truly disturbing about the MMR vaccine: it leads to detectable measles infection in the vast majority of those who receive it. The MMR vaccine’s manufacturer Merck’s own product insert, the MMR can cause measles inclusion body encephalitis (MIBE), a rare but potentially lethal form of brain infection with measles. Learn more by reading my article on the topic, “The Vaccinated Spreading Measles: WHO, Merck, CDC Documents Confirm.”
Stop Blaming A Failing Vaccine on Failure to Vaccinate
The moral of the story is that you can’t blame non-vaccinating parents for the morbidity and mortality of infectious diseases when vaccination does not result in immunity and does not keep those who are vaccinated from infecting others. In fact, outbreaks secondary to measles vaccine failure and shedding in up to 99% immunization compliant populations have happened for decades. Here are just a few examples reported in the medical literature:
  • 1985, Texas, USA: According to an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 1987, “An outbreak of measles occurred among adolescents in Corpus Christi, Texas, in the spring of 1985, even though vaccination requirements for school attendance had been thoroughly enforced.” They concluded: “We conclude that outbreaks of measles can occur in secondary schools, even when more than 99 percent of the students have been vaccinated and more than 95 percent are immune.”1
  • 1985, Montana, USA: According to an article published in the American Journal of Epidemiology titled, “A persistent outbreak of measles despite appropriate prevention and control measures,” an outbreak of 137 cases of measles occurred in Montana. School records indicated that 98.7% of students were appropriately vaccinated, leading the researchers to conclude: “This outbreak suggests that measles transmission may persist in some settings despite appropriate implementation of the current measles elimination strategy.”2
  • 1988, Colorado, USA: According to an article published in the American Journal of Public Health in 1991, “early 1988 an outbreak of 84 measles cases occurred at a college in Colorado in which over 98 percent of students had documentation of adequate measles immunity … due to an immunization requirement in effect since 1986. They concluded: “…measles outbreaks can occur among highly vaccinated college populations.”3
  • 1989, Quebec, Canada: According to an article published in the Canadian Journal of Public Health in 1991, a 1989 measles outbreak was “largely attributed to an incomplete vaccination coverage,” but following an extensive review the researchers concluded “Incomplete vaccination coverage is not a valid explanation for the Quebec City measles outbreak.4
  • 1991-1992, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: According to an article published in the journal Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, in a measles outbreak from March 1991 to April 1992 in Rio de Janeiro, 76.4% of those suspected to be infected had received measles vaccine before their first birthday.5
  • 1992, Cape Town, South Africa: According to an article published in the South African Medical Journal in 1994, “[In] August 1992 an outbreak occurred, with cases reported at many schools in children presumably immunised.” Immunization coverage for measles was found to be 91%, and vaccine efficacy found to be only 79%, leading them to conclude that primary and secondary vaccine failure was a possible explanation for the outbreak.6
There are plenty of other examples of the measles vaccine’s abject failure, including a study published in PLoS titled, “Difficulties in eliminating measles and controlling rubella and mumps: a cross-sectional study of a first measles and rubella vaccination and a second measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination,” which brought to light the glaring ineffectiveness of two measles vaccines (measles–rubella (MR) or measles–mumps–rubella (MMR) ) in fulfilling their widely claimed promise of preventing outbreaks in highly vaccine compliant populations. We dove deeply into the implications of this study in our article titled, “Why Is China Having Measles Outbreaks When 99% Are Vaccinated?
The most recent example was released on the CDC’s website today in a report titled, “Measles Outbreak in a Highly Vaccinated Population — Israel, July–August 2017,” where they describe a patient zero who had received three doses of MMR. Not unsurprisingly the CDC does not draw the obvious conclusion that the MMR vaccine failed, rather, that they should consider the measles a possibility when they examine a patient with fever and a rash even when the patient is vaccinated.
These seven outbreaks are by no means exhaustive of the biomedical literature, but illustrate just how misled the general public is about the effectiveness of measles vaccines, and the CDC’s vaccination agenda in general.  No amount of historical ignorance will erase the fact that vaccination does not equal immunization; antigenicity does not equal immunogenicity. Nor are the unintended, adverse effects of MMR and other vaccines in the CDC schedule accurately portrayed, precluding access to the medical ethical principle of informed consent.

This article was originally published at, by Founder Sayer Ji, posted here with permission. This article is copyrighted by GreenMedInfo LLC, 2018. You can sign up for their newsletter here
1T L Gustafson, A W Lievens, P A Brunell, R G Moellenberg, C M Buttery, L M Sehulster. Measles outbreak in a fully immunized secondary-school population. N Engl J Med. 1987 Mar 26 ;316(13):771-4. PMID: 3821823
2R M Davis, E D Whitman, W A Orenstein, S R Preblud, L E Markowitz, A R Hinman. A persistent outbreak of measles despite appropriate prevention and control measures. Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Sep ;126(3):438-49. PMID: 3618578
3B S Hersh, L E Markowitz, R E Hoffman, D R Hoff, M J Doran, J C Fleishman, S R Preblud, W A Orenstein. A measles outbreak at a college with a prematriculation immunization requirement. Am J Public Health. 1991 Mar ;81(3):360-4. PMID: 1994745
4N Boulianne, G De Serres, B Duval, J R Joly, F Meyer, P Déry, M Alary, D Le Hénaff, N Thériault.[Major measles epidemic in the region of Quebec despite a 99% vaccine coverage]. Can J Public Health. 1991 May-Jun;82(3):189-90. PMID: 1884314
5S A de Oliveira, W N Soares, M O Dalston, M T de Almeida, A J Costa. Clinical and epidemiological findings during a measles outbreak occurring in a population with a high vaccination coverage. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 1995 Oct-Dec;28(4):339-43. PMID: 866883
6N Coetzee, G D Hussey, G Visser, P Barron, A Keen. The 1992 measles epidemic in Cape Town–a changing epidemiological pattern. S Afr Med J. 1994 Mar ;84(3):145-9. PMID: 7740350

Wednesday, February 27, 2019

Noting father’s Holocaust survival, Zionist Jew Michael Cohen calls Trump a ‘racist’ and ‘con man’

WASHINGTON (JTA) — Prepared testimony by Michael Cohen, Donald Trump’s former fixer, says the president is a con man and a racist, and again cites his father’s survival of the Holocaust to explain why he turned on his one-time mentor and employer.
“My father survived the Holocaust thanks to the compassion and selfless acts of others,” Cohen says in a statement posted midnight and set to be delivered Wednesday in dramatic testimony to the U.S. House of Representatives. “He was helped by many who put themselves in harm’s way to do what they knew was right.”
“Mom and Dad … I am sorry that I let you down,” the testimony says.
Cohen, Trump’s longtime lawyer, has pleaded guilty to fraud and violating campaign finance laws when he paid off Trump’s alleged mistresses to keep silent and to lying to Congress about how long into the presidential campaign Trump was working on a business deal in Russia.
Trump, Cohen says in the testimony, “mesmerized” him, but now on reflection, he believes the man he once said he would take a bullet for “is a racist. He is a conman. He is a cheat.”
Cohen alleges among other incidents that Trump directed money from a charitable foundation to be used to buy a portrait of himself; that Trump knew that a friend and former aide, Roger Stone, was soliciting Russian intervention in the election; that Trump directed him to threaten schools and the College Board not to release his grades and scores; and that Trump casually and repeatedly derided blacks.
Responding on Twitter, Trump said Cohen is “lying in order to reduce his prison time.”
“Michael Cohen was one of many lawyers who represented me (unfortunately),” the president tweeted. “He had other clients also. He was just disbarred by the State Supreme Court for lying & fraud. He did bad things unrelated to Trump.”

Featured Post

I Need Some Help......

Go Fund Me   Photos of the damages to my home   Photos of my home before the damages   First, let me thank anyone who is reading this very p...

Popular Posts This Week