Saturday, June 29, 2019

What if the National Socialists Won WWII and Took Over America?


A new television series based on the novel The Man in the High Castle by Philip K. Dick is soon to be released on Amazon video.
The events depicted in the book, as well as the show, take place in 1962 in an alternative reality where the Nazis had won the Second World War and then along with the Japanese invaded and conquered America.
The pilot of the show has been available free for some time now, for promotional and screening purposes. Despite being visually well done, it is pretty awful. The world in it, of course, is shown to be a nightmarish dystopia, in line with the mainstream historical narrative that the Nazis were the most evil people who ever lived. Would things really be so bad if the allies had lost that war though, taking into account what, thanks to the internet, are now easily accessible facts about those events and what National Socialism was really all about? Well I guess it depends on who’s asking.
For Jews this would obviously not be a good thing. But for Whites, who just so happen to be on the brink of extinction, it’s a different story.
Although unfortunately I don’t have a multi-million dollar budget and a mainstream platform to propagandize large portions of the masses with my vision of things, like they do in Jewish-run Hollywood, I’d still like to briefly indulge in a little bit of fantasy myself, and give what I believe is a much more honest assessment of this hypothetical scenario, just for fun.
Firstly, Europe most certainly would not be having a “migrant crisis” right now if Germany had won that war. They would be a proud people who would fight for their borders and their ethnic integrity, because they wouldn’t be wracked with White guilt and “pathological altruism.” That’s all that really needs to be said of Europe as concerns WWII, as that is the issue which overshadows all other issues Europe has ever faced in its entire history.
This is a fact that cannot be denied by anybody but a liar or a fool: The suicide/genocide of indigenous White Europeans simply would not be happening, had National Socialism/Fascism won WWII.
But what would America look like if Nazis took it over (we’ll have to slightly alter the given scenario and pretend that this means that Americans who believe in the National Socialist ideology took over rather than it being invaded and occupied by Germans, as that proposal is too absurd to even consider).
Can you imagine a Judenfrei New York? It’s easy if you try…
The following would immediately go into effect:
1. The Federal Reserve and all usurious banking would be halted immediately and replaced by debt-free currency backed by the hard work of the American man.
2. Hollywood would be shut down and replaced by patriotic Americans who cared deeply about our history, our people and the upholding of high moral standards.
3. Jews would be rounded up and deported to a homeland of their own where they would be isolated by the force of the US Military.
4. Education on the Jewish question would become mandatory and perpetual in the understanding that they must never, at any time in the future, be allowed to subvert the Western world again.
5. The border to Mexico would be sealed. It would be announced that any illegal aliens caught crossing the border would be shot on sight and then this threat would be swiftly carried out.
6. A eugenics program would go into effect for humanitarian purposes with the goal of alleviating the suffering of future generations through the minimization of disease, crime and welfare. Healthy and productive members of society would be incentivized to have more children and the unproductive and sickly elements would be incentivized not to, most likely by a generous payment for sterilization.
7. Blacks would be humanely deported back to Africa and helped onto their feet there. Once they were set up with a functioning society they would be left on their own and in charge of their own destiny, back where they belong and where they could cause no further harm to White civilization.
8. Class tensions would be minimized if not outright eliminated. The working man would be elevated in the mind of the people as the backbone of the nation. It would be understood that that everybody is important to society, garbage men and street sweepers as well as doctors and lawyers or politicians or small business owners.
9. Democracy would be replaced with meritocracy. Our leaders would be chosen based on ability rather than on who could get the most campaign donations and best con the people with promises they will never follow through with after elected.
10. The promotion of any and all kinds of perversions and degeneracy would be treated as an attack on the family thus an attack at the very foundation of civilization and the nation itself and as such would be ruthlessly crushed and suppressed.
The list of course could go on an on, but suffice it to say life would be objectively better for all White people. Any White who would disagree with that (read: the vast majority of them) just hasn’t thought it through very clearly or has had their head filled up with gibberish such as what’s found in this garbage Jew TV show, The Man in the High Castle.
This is not up for debate because the White race’s very genetic existence is under threat of extinction today and that is the worst possible state a people can be in, as the only discernible purpose to the life of any species is the continuation and perpetuation of its own kind.
Of course we would no doubt still have plenty of problems, as life is an eternal struggle, and history is entirely unpredictable, but we wouldn’t be living under an anti-White system hellbent on White genocide through forced integration and mass immigration in our own lands, if National Socialists took over, that’s for sure – which is why I’d still like to see this happen, naturally, since I am a National Socialist myself, and I don’t like the idea of my race going extinct.
To anybody else but a normal, straight, White man – Jews, non-Whites, homosexuals, etc. – maybe our current world is a paradise. I really don’t know, nor do I care.
I care about my people and my people only and right now, they are in a living hell, whether they know it or not – and that’s largely due to the outcome of the Second World War.
But there’s another war coming, to be sure, and this time we better get it right. It will be our last chance.

Leader of Personal Sacrifice: Adolf Hitler


National Socialism, like every revolutionary movement, is fueled by personal sacrifice.
Our movement is unique in that not only did our leader set an example of personal sacrifice during the struggle for power, but did so throughout his entire life. When Hitler was just a young man he signed over his orphan pension to his younger sister, Paula, and then struck out on his own to survive in a hostile world, where his daily bread had to be bitterly won. This early example of putting the needs of others before himself was constant in his life.
During World War One, Hitler shared all the hardships of the common soldiers. His regiment was bled white at the front. As its strength declined, each man was called upon to do more. No man ever did more than Hitler. He constantly volunteered for extra duties, took the most hazardous assignments, and narrowly missed death dozens of times. It was as if by his sheer will alone he could bring victory to Germany. When it was time for him to go on a well-deserved rest or furlough, he refused and instead would give it to a married man so he could spend time at home with his family.
After the stab in the back and Germany’s humiliating defeat, Hitler vowed to dedicate the remainder of his life to making Germany great and overturning the evil treaty of Versailles. During these years of struggle, he knew even greater privation than he did in his youth.
His personal wardrobe was so shabby that a party member had to donate a suit so the Führer could meet with the big shot industrialists. Not only did he live humbly so every mark could go into the fight, but he also had to abandon his dream of ever becoming (or so he thought at the time) an artist or architect.
Materialistic gains were not the only sacrifices that the party demanded of its leader. Hitler often lamented that he could not enjoy the hearth and bosom of his own family, because he could not marry since he was married to all of Germany. Worse yet, he knew he could never know the joy of fatherhood, because it would be unfair to his children, i.e. the burden of following in his footsteps would be too great for them.
When the war forced itself upon Germany, the Führer had to abandon his dream of rebuilding his cities. He then donned his uniform and refused to take it off until victory was achieved. He worked round the clock, always having more and more to do. His headquarters, the "wolf’s lair" in Rastenburg, was buried in a swampy forest that was too hot in the summer and too cold in the winter. His staff regarded it as a joyless assignment and could not wait until they were reassigned to Paris or Berlin, leaving the Führer behind to toil on for Germany without entertainment, bright lights, or the sweet fruit of victory.
In the Führer bunker in the spring of 1945, Hitler would steal away from the military conferences for a few minutes to admire the models of the magnificent National Socialist cities which he dreamed of building after the war, knowing only too well that they would never be built in his life time.
When Soviet shells began to fall on the city, he told Waffen SS General Leon Degrelle that if he had had a son, he would have wanted him to be like Degrelle, but that Degrelle must preserve his life along with Colonel Hans-Ulrich Rudel, so that they would inspire the future German youth with their heroism. The Fuhrer said that he would make the ultimate sacrifice for Germany and not run away, but fight the enemy to the bitter end, and then deprive the capitalists and bolsheviks of their Jewish pleasure of not only putting him on trial, but also of mutilating his body, and so he fought until the "Untermenschen" were only a few meters away, and then he flew up to Valhalla.
Adolf Hitler was a man who sacrificed himself, his entire life, for his people. The great virtue is an intrinsic characteristic of National Socialism, i.e. sacrifice of the indivudual for the greater good. This is why a single National Socialist is worth a hundred Democrats or Republicans. It is what makes us so strong and so feared.
As a young stormtrooper, I used to work 48 hours a week in a local factory, donate my entire paycheck to the party, clean the headquarters, man the desk, collect signatures on petitions, cook meals, do television interviews, and every once in a while have some fun in a street battle with the scum of the earth. Most of the "fair weather" National Socialists were hard to find when it came time to do work or donate some real money. Not surprisingly, they were all weeded out of the movement not by death threats or bombs, but by their lack of conviction in National Socialism. They wanted to "party" and to reap glory from other comrades’ worthy sacrifices. These drones quickly left the party, and each time they did, it made us stronger.
Compared to the sacrifices of our Führer, my money, sweat and blood are a paltry offering. However, our movement is full today of comrades whose sacrifices make them heros: real National Socialists like Reinhard Sonntag, who gave his life just a few years ago, and Gottfried Küssel, who has been in jail over two years (and faces another eight years in prison) as well as many, many more who, for security reasons, cannot be named, but without whom you would not today be holding this newspaper in your hands and reading this article.
We National Socialists judge a man or woman by one test of strength only, and that is how much they sacrifice for victory. How smart they are (or think they are), how rich they are, what good fighters they claim to be, or how much beer they can consume, all mean nothing...only how much a person gives of himself!
Each one of us - you and I included – must ask himself that key question!
Heil Hitler!
(Written by Michael Storm - NSDAP/AO)

“Swedish” Documentary Claims First Swedes Were Negroids with Blue Eyes


“The First Swedes” is a documentary that was put out this year by SVT, a national broadcaster funded by the Swedish taxpayers. It tells a ridiculous story about dark-skinned hunters and gatherers with blue eyes, who left the south at the end of the Ice Age and moved to Scandinavia, where they mingled with immigrants from the east to create the ancestors of the modern Swedes.
The documentary was obviously met with a good deal of backlash from Swedes, who remain unconvinced that their ancestors were negroids with blue eyes, despite all the “scientific” evidence. Both RT and Sputnik covered this story, essentially presenting the insane (((theory))) as if it was true and making the unconvinced Swedes seem like ignorant bigots. Cultural marxism has always been a favorite export for the “former” Soviet Union, but according to this propaganda piece from the Sochi Olympics, the founders of Russia were definitely not negroids.
RT reports:
The documentary will look at DNA technology which has revealed more about how Sweden was populated after the Ice Age and detailing how the first pioneers in the country were dark-skinned with blue eyes and came from the south.
It’s science, guys. You can’t argue with DNA technology!
Another population of people who had paler skin and a variety of eye and hair colors arrived around the same time from the east. The two peoples are thought to have mixed fairly quickly, and Nordic people eventually became lighter skinned, allowing them to increase their vitamin D production to survive in the dark winters.
Ah yes, the First Swedes were saved by quickly race mixing!
Some Twitter users took the information advertised in the documentary as some sort of conspiracy aimed at making people more open to immigration. “Indoctrination continues,” one said.
Yes, of course this is indoctrination to get people to accept “dark-skinned brothers and sisters” from the south.
Now onto the Sputnik article:
Mattias Jakobsson, a professor of genetics at Uppsala University and a researcher of the Atlas project, which aims to map the genome of Sweden’s early population, stressed that unlike present-day Swedes, their ancestors had dark skin, as a legacy of their African origin.
Sputnik features some of the comical reactions to these “revelations” about the First Swedes, such as this photoshopped image of Dagens Nyheter, a large Swedish headline, with the headline “Vikings were African gays” and caption “Expert: Swedes are dumb and don’t exist”.
Journalist Ingrid Carlsson tweeted:
The BBC has been doing this for a long time, for homogeneous Sweden to be portrayed as populated by black people is too outlandish to be true.”
Some Swedes were quick to point out that the BBC tried pulling the same stunt with the British people last year, when they claimed that analysis of “Cheddar man” revealed that the 10,000 year old skeleton actually had dark skin, which means that the “First Brits” were really negroids too!
The sad thing is that many people will not be able to see this for the obvious anti-White propaganda that it is.

Friday, June 28, 2019

“German” Intelligence Kvetches About Rise of “Anti-semitism” in Occupied Germany


The Associated Press is reporting that occupied Germany’s domestic intelligence agency BfV (Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz) is growing alarmed about the increase in anti-semitism and an associated rise in “far-right extremists.”
The BfV agency is claiming in its annual report, which was released Thursday, that the number of “anti-Semitic” violent acts is up to 48, from 21 the previous year, which is an increase of 71.4%.
Do they even keep track of the number of anti-German attacks that take place due to the immigrant invasion that occupied Germany’s politicians welcomed in? Just like with World War II, the immense suffering of the Germany people does not matter; the only thing with which we should concern ourselves is the alleged (and massively debunked) suffering of jews and other minorities.
BfV is also claiming that the number of “far-right extremists” (i.e., any German that does not like having their borders opened by jews so that their country can be completeley overrun) has also risen by 100, up to 24,100 people. Occupied intelligence is saying that half of these people could be “potentially violent.”
I have to wonder where in the world they are getting these numbers (maybe Faceberg is providing them data on “hate suspects”), but even if the data is legitimate, they are kvetching about a 0.4% increase, which is far below what I would suspect, especially as Germany is the #2 country (behind the US) for both Renegade Tribune and Renegade Broadcasting.
The patriotic Germans who are resisting jewish-orchestrated White genocide are being persecuted by an alien ruling elite. They are standing up against an incredibly hostile and violent system that wants to see them eradicated, as has been detailed in the Kalergi Plan, the Hooton Plan, the Morgenthau Plan, and more.
One of the jews actively persecuting indigenous Germans is Anneta Kahane, a former Stasi agent.
Back in 1998 she started the Amadeu Antonio Foundation in order to “combat xenophobia, antisemitism and right-wing extremism.” She received the Moses Mendelssohn prize for this work in 2012, which was donated by the Senate of Berlin. In 2015 she was employed by the occupied German government to lead a task force against “xenophobic” facebook posts.
Kahane is quoted as saying:
In Eastern Germany are not enough people, who are visible minorities, for example blacks.”
Thanks jewish subversive for letting people know who is behind the White genocide agenda! Kahane also stated:
It’s a confession of failure that one third of this country is still white”
These quotes remind me of what Hitler stated many years ago:
the Jews had brought the Negroes into the Rhineland with the clear aim of ruining the hated white race by the necessarily-resulting bastardization.”
As just one more example of a jewish subversive (there are many!), here we have a jewish politician in occupied Germany calling Germans “Nazis” and saying that their extinction is “fortunate.”
Of course hostility towards jews is always portrayed as completely unjustified and irrational. The reasons why patriotic Germans oppose these insane genocidal jews is never mentioned in the mainstream media.
Interior Minister Horst Seehofer recently said:
we can find in almost all areas of far-right extremism hostile attitudes toward Jews … it’s a development that we must take, very, very, very seriously.”
Seehofer also said that the “far-right” also sees migrants, Muslims and politicians as enemies. Well, of course they do! jews and their proxies are seeking to obliterate the German people, along with the entire White race! It’s a development we here at Renegade “must take very, very, very seriously.”

Jewish Slut Miriam Adelson hopes there will be a biblical ‘Book of Trump’


(JTA) — It isn’t news that Sheldon and Miriam Adelson are big fans of President Donald Trump.
The Republican mega-donors gave millions to Trump’s presidential campaign in 2016. But Miriam Adelson took it one step further on Thursday.
The Israeli-American physician compared the president to biblical prophets in an article in which she asked why he has not enjoyed higher support among American Jews.
“That this has not been the case (so far, the 2020 election still beckons) is an oddity that will long be pondered by historians,” Adelson wrote in an an article for Israel Hayom, of which she is the publisher. “Scholars of the Bible will no doubt note the heroes, sages, and prophets of antiquity who were similarly spurned by the very people they came to raise up.”
She went on to say she wished there would be a biblical book named after Trump in the future.
“Would it be too much to pray for a day when the Bible gets a ‘Book of Trump,’ much like it has a ‘Book of Esther’ celebrating the deliverance of the Jews from ancient Persia?” Adelson asked.

Thursday, June 27, 2019

RUSSIA REPORTEDLY INTERFERED WITH AIR NAVIGATION IN ISRAEL

https://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Russia-interferes-with-Israeli-air-navigation-amid-historic-trilateral-Army-Radio-593849

Senior Israeli officials say they believe that Russia has been disrupting civilian aircraft navigation systems for the past three weeks, according to reports released Thursday morning. Army Radio called the move a “hostile attack.”

The Airports Authority announced on Wednesday that pilots were having difficulty landing, experiencing mysterious disruptions. To resolve the issue, Israel has sent a defense official to Russia to discuss the disruption, Army Radio reported.

Russia has denied the report.

Despite the interference, the Airports Authority was able to ensure safe landings for its incoming planes.

“As a result of the disturbances, changes were made in some of the entry procedures for landing to ensure safety; these are procedures used daily in airports around the world,” the authority said in a statement. “At no stage was there a safety incident related to GPS interference in connection with the accuracy of navigation and flight routes. From the first day that the disturbance appeared, all of the elements in Israel have been working to solve the problem and find the source of the problem.”

The military explained that the incident was purely civilian and did not affect any of its activities. However, the army has been assisting with the disturbance “to allow freedom of action” in Israeli airspace.

“The IDF is constantly working to preserve the freedom of action and operational supremacy in the spectrum,” it said in a statement.

The report on the disturbance comes only days after Russian Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev was in Jerusalem for a historic trilateral meeting with US and Israeli national security advisers John Bolton and Meir Ben-Shabbat.

Intergenerational Warfare Is a Scam—We Need to Expand Social Security and End Student Debt

President Franklin Roosevelt famously remarked about attacks on Social Security, “It is an old strategy of tyrants to delude their victims into fighting their battles for them.” We can see that strategy at work today.

The “tyrants” are the billionaire class, ideologically opposed to contributing their fair share to the common good, and the politicians they finance. Those powerful forces are working surreptitiously to frame a narrative that so-called greedy geezers are to blame, selfishly taking for themselves at the expense of their grandchildren. Former Senator Alan Simpson (R-WY), who has used the term “greedy geezer” so often that many think he coined the term, said about seniors fighting cuts to Social Security, “[W]ho are the people howling and bitching the most? The people over 60… Those people… don’t care a whit about their grandchildren… not a whit.”

The goal of Simpson and his billionaire cronies is to convince younger generations to fight older generations over scraps, rather than joining together to demand more. A recent Twitter kerfuffle exemplifies the strategy to “delude their victims into fighting their battles for them.” Earlier this month, a story aired on NBC Nightly News about the Senior Citizen Education Program at the University of Minnesota. This program allows senior citizens to take college courses for only $10 a credit. Many people, particularly on Twitter, were outraged at the story. Why, they asked, are seniors taking classes for a nominal fee while young people are buried under a mountain of student debt?

That’s the wrong question. The right question is, how can Americans of all generations come together to fight for greater economic security for all of us? That includes expanded Social Security; tuition-free college and cancellation of student debt. The truth is that younger workers are going to rely on Social Security even more than today’s retirees. The truth is that seniors are better off if their grandchildren can start their adult lives debt-free.

The truth is also that, the University of Minnesota’s program aside, seniors across the country are in fact trapped by student debt along with their younger counterparts—and are even having their hard-earned Social Security benefits garnished to pay off those debts. According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, student debt is an increasingly heavy burden on seniors. In 2005, 700,000 Americans aged 60 and older had student debt. By 2015, that number quadrupled to 2.8 million—and it’s no doubt considerably higher today. Seniors owe over $86 billion in student debt.

In many cases, this debt comes from helping their children (or grandchildren) attend college. Our broken system forced these seniors to choose between their own retirement and their children’s futures, and they picked their children. For the crime of wanting their family to live out the American Dream, they are condemned to decades of poverty.

In other cases, this debt comes from going back to school themselves, relatively late in life. Many people, particularly women, face ageism in the workplace as early as their 40s. Employers don’t want to pay the higher salaries that more experienced workers command, and they especially don’t want to pay higher health care costs (one of many reasons we need to enact Medicare for All).

Those laid off in midlife often chose to go back to school to gain new skills. In the process, they incur student debt that will follow them for the rest of their lives. Instead of a source of outrage, the University of Minnesota program should be a source of inspiration. It should be a model for what we need to offer everyone, of all ages.

Thomas Paine, a founding father of our nation, proposed that all young people be given a lump sum payment at the age of 21. Paine rightly saw that not only should people start adulthood free of debt, but they should also start with some property.

Tuition-free public college does not go as far as Paine’s vision, but it is an important start. People should be starting their adulthood with assets, not burdens. In the wealthiest country in the history of the world, everyone who wants an education should be able to get it without being shackled to debt for decades.

Furthermore, we must act aggressively to protect those who are already caught in the student debt trap. Senators Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Sherrod Brown (D-OH) have introduced the Protection of Social Security Benefits Restoration Act, which would stop the federal government from garnishing the Social Security checks of people with student debt. Passage of this bill would be an important first step. But we must go further.

This week, Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), and Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-MN) introduced acollege affordability package. The package makes public colleges and universities tuition-free for all who attend and cancels all student debt.

In the fight to pass these wise proposals into law, we must be ready for Roosevelt’s “tyrants,” who will seek to use their money and influence to thwart the common good. They have always been with us and probably always will.

In the 19th century, the nation recognized the importance of public education. In response to the idea, John Randolph, a Virginia politician and wealthy landowner, argued against universal public schools, claiming it would perniciously “ease individuals of their natural and moral obligations” to take responsibility for the education of their own children.

Today, you hear similar arguments about the moral obligation of paying off the outrageous debts incurred for the “crime” of higher education. Just as our forebearers made public K-12 education a right, we must make public college a right despite the objections of modern-day John Randolphs. We must cancel the debt of those of all ages who find themselves caught in the student debt crisis. And we must be on guard against those who seek to divide and conquer us.

The reality is that, in the 21st century with its technological advances, today’s work often requires more than a high school diploma. Like free high school, there should be free college as well. It only makes sense that those who have been caught in the web of unaffordable college now have those debts canceled.

Expanding Social Security, tuition-free public college and the cancellation of student debt should not pit one generation against another. All of us are better off if grandparents have dignified and secure retirements, and grandchildren are well-educated, starting adulthood debt free. If we can join together to ensure that the wealthiest among us pay their fair share, all of that is within reach.

Nancy J. Altman is a writing fellow for Economy for All, a project of the Independent Media Institute. She has a 40-year background in the areas of Social Security and private pensions. She is president of Social Security Works and chair of the Strengthen Social Security coalition. Her latest book is The Truth About Social SecurityShe is also the author of The Battle for Social Security and co-author of Social Security Works!

On Kristallnacht anniversary, yellow stars appear on Jewish homes in Scandinavia

https://www.jta.org/quick-reads/on-kristallnacht-anniversary-yellow-stars-appear-on-jewish-homes-in-scandinavia ( JTA ) — Stickers shap...

Most Popular Posts This Week