Tuesday, April 30, 2019

Blackpool, UK, Demonstrates Reality of “Great Replacement” White Genocide



Blackpool, famous for its fun fairs, rollercoasters, arcades and other traditional beachfront holiday activities, was completely taken over by nonwhite invaders on St. George’s Day - a mix of Africans, Pakistanis, Indians, and others of indeterminate origin.
Whites were simply physically driven off the beachfront by the mass nonwhite invasion, as the video, originally loaded onto YouTube, clearly showed.
The controlled media and other anti-white political activists still maintain that white genocide is a myth perpetrated by “racists”—yet the facts all conclusively show that the process of replacing white people with nonwhites in European nations is underway.
The definition of Genocide is, according to the Mirriam Webster dictionary, derived from the stem words GENO- + -CIDE. Geno comes from the Greek for “genos birth, race, kind,” and –cide from the Middle French, from Latin -cida, from “caedere to cut, kill.”
It is therefore, literally, the killing off of a race or kind. And this is exactly what the Great Replacement, or white genocide is: the killing off of white people in their ancestral homelands by the mass migration of nonwhites, with the determined aim of outbreeding and eventually swamping white people.
Only a fool, madman, or a malicious person can deny this reality.

Poway Synagogue Shooter: “White Genocide Causing White Terrorism”


White genocide - the extermination of the white race through the flooding of European lands with Third Worlders - is the primary cause of the rise of white terrorism, according to the manifesto of the Poway, California, Synagoge shooter.
John Earnest, a 19-year-old student at California State University San Marcos, who was arrested after carrying out a shooting at the synagogue - which, fortunately for the congregants, appeared to have gone wrong because of a weapon malfunction - released an manifesto on the internet prior to his attack.
In this manifesto, Earnest explained the reasons for his attack, blaming Jews for white genocide, and claiming that the Jewish-controlled media and establishment was making it impossible for ordinary white people to live normal lives, and hence there would be an ever-increasing number of terrorist attacks like his.
In the manifesto, titled “An open letter,” Earnest directed comments at the controlled media, telling them to “Make sure to call me a ‘white supremacist’ and ‘anti-semite’ or whatever bullshit you spew to spook the normalfags. It doesn’t even matter. You’ve been calling every White person alive those names for decades - they’ve lost all their meaning.
“You’ve socially ostracized every White person. You’ve made it harder and harder for White people to live a normal life.
“To this I say well done. You are stupid enough to make a White person’s only viable option for survival to kill all of you. Keep doing what you’re doing Jew-media. You’re putting the noose around your own neck. The irony is glorious.”
Starting off by providing details of his ancestry, Earnest said that “The blood that runs in my veins is the same that ran through the English, Nordic, and Irish men of old” and that he was a “descendant of one of the original colonists of Roanoke - John Earnest.” In addition, he said, he “inherited from his mother’s side “the blood of very wealthy Yankees - intelligent, resourceful, uncompromising,” and from his father’s side, he “inherited the blood of poor Southern farmers - intelligent, musically gifted, self-sufficient.”
He then went on to direct his words to answer those who questioned his actions: “To my family and friends. I can already hear your voices. ‘How could you throw your life away? You had everything! You had a loving family. You had great friends. You had a church. You were doing well in nursing school. You could have gone so far in your field of study. You could have made so much money and started a happy family of your own.’
“I understand why you would ask this. But I pose a question to you now. What value does my life have compared to the entirety of the European race?,” Earnest wrote.
“Is it worth it for me to live a comfortable life at the cost of international Jewry sealing the doom of my race?
“No. I will not sell my soul by sitting idly by as evil grows. I’d rather die in glory or spend the rest of my life in prison than waste away knowing that I did nothing to stop this evil. It is not in my blood to be a coward. I do not care about the debt-based currency that Jews like to pretend is money.
“I do not care for the bread and circus that Jewry has used to attempt to pacify my people. I willingly sacrifice my future - the future of having a fulfilling job, a loving wife, and amazing kids. I sacrifice this for the sake of my people. OUR people. I would die a thousand times over to prevent the doomed fate that the Jews have planned for my race.”
He then goes on to pose the question which undoubtedly many will ask “How does killing Jews help the European race? The European race is doomed? What are you talking about? These Jews were innocent!”
In answering this, Earnest, who claims to be a Christian, goes on to blame Jews for being responsible, “as a unit” for the “the meticulously planned genocide of the European race .”
He says: “Every Jew is responsible for the meticulously planned genocide of the European race. They act as a unit, and every Jew plays his part to enslave the other races around him - whether consciously or subconsciously.
“Their crimes are endless. For lying and deceiving the public through their exorbitant role in news media; for using usury and banks to enslave nations in debt and control all finances for the purpose of funding evil; for their role in starting wars on a foundation of lies which have costed millions of lives throughout history; for their role in cultural Marxism and communism; for pushing degenerate propaganda in the form of entertainment; for their role in feminism which has enslaved women in sin; for causing many to fall into sin with their role in peddling pornography; for their role in voting for and funding politicians and organizations who use mass immigration to displace the European race; for their large role in every slave trade for the past two-thousand years; for promoting race mixing; for their cruel and bloody history of genocidal behavior; for their persecution of Christians of old (including the prophets of ancient Israel - Jeremiah, Isaiah, etc.), members of the early church (Stephen - whose death at the hands of the Jews was both heart-wrenching and rage-inducing), Christians of modern-day Syria and Palestine, and Christians in White nations; for their degenerate and abominable practices of sexual perversion and blood libel (you are not forgotten Simon of Trent, the horror that you and countless children have endured at the hands of the Jews will never be forgiven); for not speaking about these crimes; for not attempting to stop the members of their race from committing them.”
Earnest goes on to blame Jews for killing Jesus Christ, saying “And finally, for their role in the murder of the Son of Man - that is the Christ. Every Jew young and old has contributed to these. For these crimes they deserve nothing but hell. I will send them there.”
The violence and vehemence of his manifesto must have been obvious even to Earnest, because the nest question he poses - and answers - attempts to address this very issue.
Asking “Why are you doing this? Surely killing a fraction of Jews will not solve any problems. Are there not better ways to save the European race?” he goes on to say that the answer is “Yes and no,” and goes on to claim the right to “violent self-defense.”
“There are three roles that must be played in this revolution,” he wrote. “Those who spread the truth, those who defend the race, and those who continue the race (having children). Where most people misunderstand is that all three of these must be performed by everyone to the best of his ability.
“There has been little done when it comes to defending the European race. As an individual I can only kill so many Jews. My act of defense is not so much about my high score - that is how many Jews I can ‘Do not pass go, do not collect 200 shekels’ straight to fucking hell. But rather the statement that I made.
“There is at least one European man alive who is willing to take a stand against the injustice that the Jew has inflicted upon him. That my act will inspire others to take a stand as well. And when this revolution starts gaining traction (if I am not killed) I expect to be freed from prison and continue the fight. I do not seek fame. I do not seek power. I only wish to inspire others and be a soldier that has the honor and privilege of defending his race in its greatest hour of need - and have a family if possible.”
He then poses the question of how he, as a Christian, justifies his murderous attack. “How can you call yourself a Christian and do this? Surely the Bible calls for you to love your enemies?” he writes, before answering “Firstly, just because someone calls themselves a Christian does not make them one. Plenty of people wrongfully identify with being Christian.
“Beyond the scope of time the Father and the Son made a covenant in eternity - that the Son would bring a people to Him that He may be glorified through them. I did not choose to be a Christian. The Father chose me. The Son saved me. And the Spirit keeps me.
“Why me? I do not know. And my answer to loving my enemies? Trust yids and their puppet braindead lemming normalfags to take one quote from the Bible and grossly twist its meaning to serve their own evil purposes - meanwhile ignoring the encompassing history and context of the entire Bible and the wisdom it takes to apply God’s law in a broken world.
“Is it lawful to let a thief murder my friend instead of killing the thief to prevent the death of my friend?
“To ask such a question is to answer it. It is not loving towards your friend to let him be murdered. It is not loving towards your enemy - the thief - to let him murder.
“A child can understand the concept of self-defense. It is unlawful and cowardly to stand on the sidelines as the European people are genocided around you. I did not want to have to kill Jews. But they have given us no other option. I’m just a normal dude who wanted to have a family, help and heal people, and play piano.
“But the Jew - with his genocidal instincts - is insistent on poking the bear until it tears his head off. The Jew has forced our hand, and our response is completely justified.
“My God does not take kindly to the destruction of His creation. Especially one of the most beautiful, intelligent, and innovative races that He has created. Least of all at the hands of one of the most ugly, sinful, deceitful, cursed, and corrupt. My God understands why I did what I did.”

50,000 Palestinian Children Imprisoned by Israeli Kangaroo Courts Since 1967

http://www.renegadetribune.com/50000-palestinian-children-imprisoned-by-israeli-kangaroo-courts-since-1967/

By Whitney Webb
JERUSALEM — According to figures released by the Prisoners’ and Freed Prisoners’ Committee of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) on Sunday, the state of Israel has imprisoned more than 50,000 children since the occupation of Palestine’s West Bank began in 1967. The PLO report, which was cited by Middle East Monitor, also noted that around 17,000 of those child arrests had occurred since the year 2000. The report used the UN definition that states that a child is any person younger than 18 years of age. However, Israel’s government has defined children younger than 16 as children, while applying the UN definition to Israeli children.
The PLO report — titled “Child Detention… Facts and Statistics… Effects on the Reality and Future of Palestinian Childhood” — was made public as the head of the PLO Prisoner committee, Abdul Nasser Ferwaneh, gave testimony to the 5th European Union conference in support of prisoners. In delivering his report and testimony, Ferwaneh noted that the rate of child imprisonment by the Israeli state had nearly doubled, averaging around 700 children imprisoned annually from 2000 to 2010 but rising to around 1,250 between 2011 and 2018.
Defense for Children International Palestine (DCIP), citing data from the Israeli Prison Service (IPS) and Israeli army temporary detention facilities, recently reported that 414 Palestinian children were imprisoned by Israeli military courts in just the first two months of 2019.
An apartheid system with kangaroo courts
Since 1967, Palestinian children have been subjected to Israeli military law while Israeli settlers living in illegal West Bank settlements are governed by Israel’s civilian criminal legal system. Aside from the fact that subjecting two different populaces in the same area to two different legal systems is a clear manifestation of apartheid, Israel is the only country in the world that automatically tries children in military courts, courts that lack basic fair trial guarantees and have a near-automatic conviction rate. In addition, many Palestinian children are arbitrarily detained, or imprisoned without charge.
Most Palestinian children tried in military court are accused of throwing stones — which, as of 2015, can carry a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. No Israeli child has ever been tried in an Israeli military court.
Children in detention in Israeli jails are often subjected to various forms of abuse, including “slapping, beating, kicking and violent pushing” as well as verbal abuse, according to prisoner-rights group Adameer. Adameer has also noted that Palestinian children are sometimes threatened with rape in order to extract confessions, which are often written in Hebrew — a language most Palestinian children can’t read or understand.
Obaida Akram Jawabra, a 15-year-old who has already been arrested twice by Israel, told DCIP that in prison “[Israeli] soldiers would beat me in places that would leave no marks so there wouldn’t be evidence on my body that I could use to testify against them.” Figures released by DCIP claim that 75 percent of Palestinian child prisoners report being subjected to physical violence while in prison and 62 percent report being subjected to verbal violence.
The majority of Palestinian children in detention are unable to receive family visits, since nearly 60 percent of all child detainees are transferred from the West Bank to Israeli prisons upon conviction. This practice, which violates the Fourth Geneva Convention — coupled with restrictions on Palestinians’ freedom of movement in the West Bank and the long delays in issuing permits for entry to Israel — prevents the vast majority of West Bank Palestinian families from visiting their imprisoned children.
While Israel’s government often touts itself as the “only democracy” in the Middle East, it is also the only government in the entire world that detains children through military courts with a near 100 percent conviction rate, something that even Saudi Arabia does not do. Israel’s practice of imprisoning Palestinian children is a clear violation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, ratified by Israel in 1991, as it routinely robs thousands of children of their right to a safe childhood.

Feature Photo | Israeli police place a Palestinian boy in a chokehold in Jerusalem’s Old City, July 17, 2017. Mahmoud Illean | AP
Whitney Webb is a MintPress News journalist based in Chile. She has contributed to several independent media outlets including Global Research, EcoWatch, the Ron Paul Institute and 21st Century Wire, among others. She has made several radio and television appearances and is the 2019 winner of the Serena Shim Award for Uncompromised Integrity in Journalism.

Pentagon Approves 320 Troops to Babysit Illegal Border Crossers


The Pentagon realizes that there is a big problem in the US as the border crisis continually worsens. Now they feel the need to do something. No, they don’t want to stop the invasion by tightening border security. Instead they are going to send 320 troops on a mission to the border to feed and care for migrants who have illegally crossed.
The Pentagon will be spending $7.4 million of taxpayer funds on the mission, which is admittedly chump change for an organization that cannot account for $21 trillion.
The US troops will be on the southern border helping Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in their current duties of caring for illegal aliens.
The DHS has requested additional aid to deal with the “humanitarian crisis.” Apparently they are not concerned with the crisis being caused by having wave after wave of the dregs of Central America causing havoc in American communities, thanks in part to the catch and release policies being mandated from above. They are far more concerned with getting MS-13 gang members into their jammies, tucking them in at night and making sure they feel comfy and cozy.
Okay, maybe I am exaggerating their babysitting duties a little bit, but the absurdity of this situation is simply incredible.
Troops headed down to the border in their new babysitter uniforms?

New Anti-Semitism Bill Heard on Florida Senate Floor



    1967 Speech by Myron Fagan About Illuminati, Zionism, Masonry, Skull & Bones, The CFR

    Myron Coureval Fagan (October, 31 1887 – May, 12 1972) was a jewish American writer, producer and director for film and theater. He arrived on Broadway in 1907, where he quickly became one of the youngest playwrights in American Theater. Over the years, he worked in the theater with such luminaries as Alla Nazimova, Douglas Fairbanks, and John Barrymore. He also directed plays for the top producers of the era such as Charles Frohman, David Belasco and others. Fagan also became the dramatic editor of The Associated Newspapers. Many of the actors including Humphrey Bogart, Brian Donlevy and Robert Ryan whom Fagin directed or who appeared in his plays or screen adaptions later became stars in Hollywood.
    In the mid 1940’s Myron Fagan launched crusade against what he claimed was a “Red Conspiracy in Hollywood.” Out of this crusade would come the Cinema Educational Guild. The culmination of this crusade would be the 1947 congressional hearings where more than 300 famous stars, writers, and directors from Hollywood, Radio, and TV were investigated, many of whom were blacklisted as Communists. These hearings resulted in the imprisonment of the Hollywood Ten.


    96-year-old Former SS Officer Tied Up, Robbed in His House


    A 96-year-old former member of the Waffen-SS was attacked, tied up and robbed inside his home by two unknown perpetrators posing as mailmen, German public broadcaster NDR reported.
    (DPA)
    It was unclear whether the attack was politically or criminally motivated, and police only confirmed that a break-in had taken place in a town near Hanover.
    The nonagenarian appeared in a documentary that aired in November in which he admitted to participating in a 1944 revenge in Ascq, France, but claimed that the partisans were to blame for their own deaths.
    The prosecutor's office in Hildesheim launched an investigation into the man after the documentary aired on suspicion that he had engaged in "inciteful speech".
    The office could not be reached for comment on Friday.
    The former SS officer told NDR that the two men had stolen a folder full of documents, cash and other valuables. He added that he had been discovered by a carer who arrived at the house shortly after.

    European Court backs Germany on British Bishop’s “Holocaust Denial” Conviction


    Defense lawyers said Richard Williamson was innocent because his comment denying the gas chambers aired on Swedish TV, where "Holocaust denial" is not illegal.
    The European Court of Human Rights ruled that Germany was within its rights to convict British bishop Richard Williamson of "Holocaust denial".
    Williamson, 78, sparked Jewish outcry in 2009 by denying that the Germans used gas chambers during World War II.
    His lawyers tried to argue he should not had been convicted because the comment was made during a television interview broadcast in Sweden, where Holocaust denial is not illegal.
    But the interview was recorded in Germany, where it is a criminal offense to dispute historical events during World War II.
    Williamson was convicted of "incitement to hatred" and ordered to pay a 12,000-euro fine, which was reduced to 1,800 euros ($2,100) in 2013 after a series of legal challenges.
    The European court said it found no reason to disagree with the German ruling that Williamson’s "denial and downplaying of the genocide perpetrated against the Jews had disparaged the dignity of the Jewish victims".
    It pointed out that Williamson knew his comments were illegal in Germany, and confirmed that since the interview was recorded there it was legal to prosecute the case in the country.
    He did not seek to make special arrangements to ensure that the interview would not be available beyond Sweden, and would have been aware that it would have been accessible elsewhere via satellite TV and the internet, it agreed.
    Williamson was formerly a member of the ultra-conservative Society of Saint Pius X but was kicked out in 2012 for disobeying orders from his superiors.
    He was excommunicated by the Vatican in 1988 after he was ordained by a fundamentalist archbishop against papal orders.
    He was allowed back into the Church in 2009 as part of a move by then pope Benedict to heal a rift between the Vatican and fundamentalists.
    That decision came days after the airing of Williamson’s Holocaust-denying Swedish interview.

    Study: Number of Germans Murdered, Brutally Attacked by Migrants Doubles in Year


    According to statistics published by the Federal Criminal Police Office, Germans are more likely to get hurt or killed in a crime committed by an immigrant than vice versa.
    At the same time, the number of serious offences, like homicides and assaults, committed by newcomers has increased in comparison to 2017.
    One in 10 victims of serious crimes in Germany is assaulted by an asylum seeker or refugee, Die Welt reports, citing the Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA). Its 2018 report “Crime in the Context of Immigration” analysed statistics of murders, homicides, assaults, robberies, and offences against sexual self-determination and personal freedom. The research set out to determine how many crimes involved “asylum seekers and refugees”, as well as people who are awaiting deportation or already have a residence permit.
    Spike in Murders and Brutal Attacks
    The research suggests that Germans are significantly more likely to become victims of a crime committed by an immigrant than vice versa. Last year, 102,000 victims of serious crimes were assaulted by migrants. This number has increased by seven percent since 2017.
    The spike is more drastic when it comes to murder and manslaughter involving foreign perpetrators and German victims. 230 Germans were killed, which is twice as many as in 2017. However, the outlet noted that the statistics service (PKS) of the criminal police evaluates data only after an investigation is over, so the 2018 stats include the victims of the Islamist attack in Berlin in December 2016.
    Sexual Assaults By Refugees on the Rise
    The number of Germans sexually assaulted by asylum seekers and refugees also spiked to 3,260. In total, almost half of victims of serious crimes by foreign perpetrators (46,336 out of 101,956) were Germans. This is 19 percent more than in 2017.
    Data relating to crimes against asylum seekers or refugees allegedly assaulted by a German suspect showed that 8,455 foreigners were victims (24 per cent more than in 2017).
    Xenophobia Is No Reason
    Notably, in 2018, only 18% of foreign victims were hurt or killed by a German suspect. As the newspaper points out, the report suggests that people seeking asylum are mainly attacked by those with a similar background.
    The refugee policy and “open borders” approach, in particular, have prompted criticism against Angela Merkel’s government. European countries have been experiencing a severe migration crisis since 2015 due to an influx of thousands of migrants and refugees fleeing the Middle East and North Africa. Germany has accepted hundreds of thousands of migrants. However, over the years, the number of newcomers has dropped. According to the police, there were 300,000 asylum seekers and 697,000 refugees in Germany in December 2018.

    Three in Four London Students from Ethnic Minorities by 2030


    Almost three quarters of university students from London will be from ethnic minorities by the end of the next decade, say researchers.
    (BBC)
    The analysis, based on demographic changes and university entry rates, shows 27% of students from London will be white - down from 37% at present.
    White students will still be the biggest ethnic group - followed by 21% from African backgrounds, up from 17%.
    The report, from a university access group, forecasts "hyper-diversity".
    Londoners have high rates of university entry - with almost one in five of all students across the UK coming from the city.
    Changing demographics
    The report - from Access HE - reflects a growing ethnic minority population in the school system and says young people from black and Asian families are more likely to apply for university.
    "We are witnessing hyper-diversity among the student body in London, where diversity is the norm and not the exception," says the report.
    "Based on existing evidence, we can expect a significant increase in the number of young students entering higher education by 2030, and an increase in the diversity of these students... nearly 75% being non-white."
    There is a forecast of a particular growth in Londoners from African and mixed-race backgrounds going to university.
    The number of white students is expected to increase, but not as much as other groups - so that it will become a smaller proportion of the total.
    There will be an increase in the proportion of students from Bangladeshi backgrounds, who will become the biggest Asian group, with 8% of London students.
    No majority
    While African students are expected to become the second largest ethnic group, the proportion of students from a Caribbean background will fall from 6% to 4%.
    The number of Indian students will fall from 7% to 4%, while Pakistani students will remain at 5%.
    The prediction is of a future with no ethnic group being a majority.
    This means about a quarter of students from London will be white, a quarter black, a quarter Asian and a quarter from other groups or from a mix of backgrounds.
    The study, covering young people from state and private schools from outer and inner London, has been produced by Access HE, which works with universities and colleges on widening access.
    Students who will go to university at the end of the next decade are currently in primary school, and the analysis is based on demographic changes, university figures from the Higher Education Statistics Agency and the different levels of university participation of ethnic groups.
    The outcome could be different if these participation rates changed - for example, if more white working class youngsters applied to university, from their current low levels.
    The study predicts more students from poorer backgrounds, with many expected to be the first in their families to go to university - and the report says that universities will need to make sure they have support in place.
    There could also be changes in demand for subjects.
    Ethnic minority students are particularly likely to apply for medicine, law, business and computing courses - and less likely to apply for subjects such as history or modern languages.
    Graeme Atherton, head of Access HE, says that as well as London's student population changing, this demographic trend is going to "drive diversity" in universities in other parts of the United Kingdom.

    Adolf Hitler: My Political Testament (Berlin, 29 April 1945)


    Since 1914, when as a volunteer, I made my modest contribution in the World War which was forced upon the Reich, over thirty years have passed.
    In these three decades, only love for my people and loyalty to my people have guided me in all my thoughts, actions, and life. They gave me the strength to make the most difficult decisions, such as no mortal has yet had to face. I have exhausted my time, my working energy, and my health in these three decades.
    It is untrue that I or anybody else in Germany wanted war in 1939. It was desired and instigated exclusively by those international statesmen who were either of Jewish origin or working for Jewish interests. I have made so many offers for the reduction and elimination of armaments, which posterity cannot explain away for all eternity, that the responsibility for the outbreak of this war cannot rest on me. Furthermore, I never desired that after the first terrible World War a second war should arise against England or even against America. Centuries may pass, but out of the ruins of our cities and monuments of art there will arise anew the hatred for the people who alone are ultimately responsible: International Jewry and its helpers!
    As late as three days before the outbreak of the German-Polish War, I proposed to the British Ambassador in Berlin a solution for the German-Polish problem -- similar to the problem of the Saar area, under international control. This offer cannot be explained away, either. It was only rejected because the responsible circles in English politics wanted the war, partly in the expectation of business advantages, partly driven by propaganda promoted by international Jewry.
    But I left no doubt about the fact that if the peoples of Europe were again only regarded as so many packages of stock shares by these international money and finance conspirators, then that race, too, which is the truly guilty party in this murderous struggle would also have to be held to account: the Jews! I further left no doubt that this time we would not permit millions of European children of Aryan descent to die of hunger, nor millions of grown-up men to suffer death, nor hundreds of thousands of women and children to be burned and bombed to death in their cities, without the truly guilty party having to atone for its guilt, even if through more humane means.
    After six years of struggle, which in spite of all reverses will go down in history as the most glorious and most courageous manifestation of a people's will to live. I cannot separate myself from the city which is the capital of this Reich. Because our forces are too few to permit any further resistance against the enemy's assaults, and because individual resistance is rendered valueless by blinded and characterless scoundrels, I desire to share the fate that millions of others have taken upon themselves, in that I shall remain in this city. Furthermore, I do not want to fall into the hands of enemies who for the delectation of the hate-riddled masses require a new spectacle promoted by the Jews.
    I have therefore resolved to remain in Berlin and there to choose death of my own will at the very moment when, as I believe, the seat of the Fuehrer and Chancellor can no longer be defended. I die with a joyful heart in the awareness the immeasurable deeds and achievements of our soldiers at the front, of our women at home, the achievements of our peasants and workers, and the contribution, unique in history, of our youth, which bears my name.
    It goes without saying that I thank them all from the bottom of my heart and that it is also my desire that in spite of everything they should not give up the struggle, but continue fighting wherever they may be, faithful to the great Clausewitz, against the enemies of the Fatherland. From the sacrifices of our soldiers and from my own comradeship with them, there will come in one way or another into German history the seed of a brilliant renaissance of the National Socialist movement and thus the realization of a true national community.
    Many very brave men and women have resolved to link their lives to mine to the very end. I have requested them, and finally ordered them, not to do so, but instead to take part in the continuing struggle of the nation. I ask the commanders of the army, navy, and air force to strengthen by all possible means the spirit of resistance of our soldiers in the spirit of National Socialism, emphasizing especially that I too, as founder and creator of this movement, have preferred death to cowardly flight or even capitulation.
    May it be one day a part of the code of honor; as it is already in the navy, that the surrender of an area or of a town is impossible, and above all in this respect the leaders should give a shining example of faithful devotion to duty unto death.
    Several brave men have joined me by their own free will and do not wish to leave the capital of the Reich under any circumstances, but on the contrary are willing to perish with me here. Yet I must ask them to obey my request, and in this instance place the interests of the nation above their own feelings.
    Through their work and loyalty they will remain just as close to me as companions after my death, just as I hope that my spirit will remain amongst them and will always accompany them. Let them be hard, but never unjust; above all, let them never allow fear to counsel their actions, but may they place the honor of the nation above everything on this earth. Finally, may they be conscious of the fact that our task of building a National Socialist state represents the labor of the coming centuries, and this places every single person under an obligation always to serve the common interest and to subordinate his own interests. I demand of all Germans, all National Socialists, men and women and all soldiers of the Armed Forces, that they remain faithful and obedient to the new government and to their President unto death.
    Above all, I charge the leadership of the nation and their followers with the strict observance of the racial laws and with merciless resistance against the universal poisoners of all peoples, international Jewry.
    Given at Berlin, 29 April 1945, 4 AM.
    ADOLF HITLER
    As witnesses:
    Dr. JOSEPH GOEBBELS
    WILHELM BURGDORF
    MARTIN BORMANN
    HANS KREBS

    Japan Leads the Way: No Vaccine Mandates and No MMR Vaccine = Healthier Children

    http://www.renegadetribune.com/japan-leads-the-way-no-vaccine-mandates-and-no-mmr-vaccine-healthier-children/

    By 
    In the United States, many legislators and public health officials are busy trying to make vaccines de facto compulsory—either by removing parental/personal choice given by existing vaccine exemptions or by imposing undue quarantines and fines on those who do not comply with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) vaccine edicts. Officials in California are seeking to override medical opinion about fitness for vaccination, while those in New York are mandating the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine for 6-12-month-old infants for whom its safety and effectiveness “have not been established.”
    The U.S. has the very highest infant mortality rate of all industrialized countries, with more American children dying at birth and in their first year than in any other comparable nation—and more than half of those who survive develop at least one chronic illness.
    American children would be better served if these officials—before imposing questionable and draconian measures—studied child health outcomes in Japan. With a population of 127 million, Japan has the healthiest children and the very highest “healthy life expectancy” in the world—and the least vaccinated children of any developed country. The U.S., in contrast, has the developed world’s most aggressive vaccination schedule in number and timing, starting at pregnancy, at birth and in the first two years of life. Does this make U.S. children healthier? The clear answer is no. The U.S. has the very highest infant mortality rate of all industrialized countries, with more American children dying at birth and in their first year than in any other comparable nation—and more than half of those who survive develop at least one chronic illness. Analysis of real-world infant mortality and health results shows that U.S. vaccine policy does not add up to a win for American children.
    Japan and the U.S.; Two Different Vaccine Policies
    In 1994, Japan transitioned away from mandated vaccination in public health centers to voluntary vaccination in doctors’ offices, guided by “the concept that it is better that vaccinations are performed by children’s family doctors who are familiar with their health conditions.” The country created two categories of non-compulsory vaccines: “routine” vaccines that the government covers and “strongly recommends” but does not mandate, and additional “voluntary” vaccines, generally paid for out-of-pocket. Unlike in the U.S., Japan has no vaccine requirements for children entering preschool or elementary school.
    Japan also banned the MMR vaccine in the same time frame, due to thousands of serious injuries over a four-year period—producing an injury rate of one in 900 children that was “over 2,000 times higher than the expected rate.” It initially offered separate measles and rubella vaccines following its abandonment of the MMR vaccine; Japan now recommends a combined measles-rubella (MR) vaccine for routine use but still shuns the MMR. The mumps vaccine is in the “voluntary” category.
    Here are key differences between the Japanese and U.S. vaccine programs:
    • Japan has no vaccine mandates, instead recommending vaccines that (as discussed above) are either “routine” (covered by insurance) or “voluntary” (self-pay).
    • Japan does not vaccinate newborns with the hepatitis B (HepB) vaccine, unless the mother is hepatitis B positive.
    • Japan does not vaccinate pregnant mothers with the tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine.
    • Japan does not give flu shots to pregnant mothers or to six-month-old infants.
    • Japan does not give the MMR vaccine, instead recommending an MR vaccine.
    • Japan does not require the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine.
    No other developed country administers as many vaccine doses in the first two years of life.
    In contrast, the U.S. vaccine schedule (see Table 1) prescribes routine vaccination during pregnancy, calls for the first HepB vaccine dose within 24 hours of birth—even though 99.9% of pregnant women, upon testing, are hepatitis B negative, and follows up with 20 to 22 vaccine doses in the first year alone. No other developed country administers as many vaccine doses in the first two years of life.
    The HepB vaccine injects a newborn with a 250-microgram load of aluminum, a neurotoxic and immune-toxic adjuvant used to provoke an immune response. There are no studies to back up the safety of exposing infants to such high levels of the injected metal. In fact, the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) upper limit for aluminum in intravenous (IV) fluids for newborns is far lower at five micrograms per kilogram per day (mcg/kg/day)—and even at these levels, researchers have documented the potential for impaired neurologic development. For an average newborn weighing 7.5 pounds, the HepB vaccine has over 15 times more aluminum than the FDA’s upper limit for IV solutions.
    Unlike Japan, the U.S. administers flu and Tdap vaccines to pregnant women (during any trimester) and babies receive flu shots at six months of age, continuing every single year thereafter. Manufacturers have never tested the safety of flu shots administered during pregnancy, and the FDA has never formally licensed any vaccines “specifically for use during pregnancy to protect the infant.”
    Japan initially recommended the HPV vaccine but stopped doing so in 2013 after serious health problems prompted numerous lawsuits. Japanese researchers have since confirmed a temporal relationship between HPV vaccination and recipients’ development of symptoms.
    U.S. vaccine proponents claim the U.S. vaccine schedule is similar to schedules in other developed countries, but this claim is inaccurate upon scrutiny. Most other countries do not recommend vaccination during pregnancy, and very few vaccinate on the first day of life. This is important because the number, type and timing of exposure to vaccines can greatly influence their adverse impact on developing fetuses and newborns, who are particularly vulnerable to toxic exposures and early immune activation. Studies show that activation of pregnant women’s immune systems can cause developmental problems in their offspring. Why are pregnant women in the U.S. advised to protect their developing fetuses by avoiding alcohol and mercury-containing tuna fish, but actively prompted to receive immune-activating Tdap and flu vaccines, which still contain mercury (in multi-dose vials) and other untested substances?
    Japan initially recommended the HPV vaccine but stopped doing so in 2013 after serious health problems prompted numerous lawsuits. Japanese researchers have since confirmed a temporal relationship between HPV vaccination and recipients’ development of symptoms. U.S. regulators have ignored these and similar reports and not only continue to aggressively promote and even mandate the formerly optional HPV vaccine beginning in preadolescence but are now pushing it in adulthood. The Merck-manufactured HPV vaccine received fast-tracked approval from the FDA despite half of all clinical trial subjects reporting serious medical conditions within seven months.
    Best and Worst: Two Different Infant Mortality Results
    The CDC views infant mortality as one of the most important indicators of a society’s overall health. The agency should take note of Japan’s rate, which, at 2 infant deaths per 1,000 live births, is the second lowest in the world, second only to the Principality of Monaco. In comparison, almost three times as many American infants die (5.8 per 1,000 live births), despite massive per capita spending on health care for children (see Table 2). U.S. infant mortality ranks behind 55 other countries and is worse than the rate in Latvia, Slovakia or Cuba.
    If vaccines save lives, why are American children dying at a faster rate, and…dying younger compared to children in 19 other wealthy countries—translating into a 57 percent greater risk of death before reaching adulthood?
    To reiterate, the U.S. has the most aggressive vaccine schedule of developed countries (administering the most vaccines the earliest). If vaccines save lives, why are American children “dying at a faster rate, and…dying younger” compared to children in 19 other wealthy countries—translating into a “57 percent greater risk of death before reaching adulthood”? Japanese children, who receive the fewest vaccines—with no government mandates for vaccination—grow up to enjoy “long and vigorous” lives. International infant mortality and health statistics and their correlation to vaccination protocols show results that government and health officials are ignoring at our children’s great peril.
    Among the 20 countries with the world’s best infant mortality outcomes, only three countries (Hong Kong, Macau and Singapore) automatically administer the HepB vaccine to all newborns—governed by the rationale that hepatitis B infection is highly endemic in these countries. Most of the other 17 top-ranking countries—including Japan—give the HepB vaccine at birth only if the mother is hepatitis B positive (Table 1). The U.S., with its disgraceful #56 infant mortality ranking, gives the HepB vaccine to all four million babies born annually despite a low incidence of hepatitis B.
    Is the U.S. Sacrificing Children’s Health for Profits?
    Merck, the MMR vaccine’s manufacturer, is in court over MMR-related fraud. Whistleblowers allege the pharmaceutical giant rigged its efficacy data for the vaccine’s mumps component to ensure its continued market monopoly. The whistleblower evidence has given rise to two separate court cases. In addition, a CDC whistleblower has alleged the MMR vaccine increases autism risks in some children. Others have reported that the potential risk of permanent injury from the MMR vaccine dwarfs the risks of getting measles.
    Why do the FDA and CDC continue to endorse the problematic MMR vaccine despite Merck’s implication in fraud over the vaccine’s safety and efficacy? Why do U.S. legislators and government officials not demand a better alternative, as Japan did over two decades ago? Why are U.S. cities and states forcing Merck’s MMR vaccine on American children? Is the U.S. government protecting children, or Merck? Why are U.S. officials ignoring Japan’s exemplary model, which proves that the most measured vaccination program in the industrialized world and “first-class sanitation and levels of nutrition” can produce optimal child health outcomes that are leading the world?
    A central tenet of a free and democratic society is the freedom to make informed decisions about medical interventions that carry serious potential risks. This includes the right to be apprised of benefits and risks—and the ability to say no. The Nuremberg Code of ethics established the necessity of informed consent without “any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion.” Forcing the MMR vaccine, or any other vaccine, on those who are uninformed or who do not consent represents nothing less than medical tyranny.

    © 2019 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts. Republishing Guidelines

    U.S. Homeland Security Investigating Swastika Drawn in Building

    https://dailyarchives.org/index.php/reports/2658-u-s-homeland-security-investigating-swastika-drawn-in-building Internal email obtain...

    Most Popular Posts This Week